Um... it was a guest post from Willis Eschenbach, not Watts himself. Though, for all I know, Eschenbach has no scientific qualifications whatsoever. I liked the post because it summed up a particular perspective, and I put the link on here because it's actually quicker for me to find a link that way... (I'm still exercising something of a voluntary purdah on agw comments myself, mainly because they tend to generate more heat than light - and I'm definitely seeking the light!)
Still relying on a weather reporter for your climate science? Does he have a university degree? Not that this is decisive, but it is still relevant.
ReplyDeleteUm... it was a guest post from Willis Eschenbach, not Watts himself. Though, for all I know, Eschenbach has no scientific qualifications whatsoever. I liked the post because it summed up a particular perspective, and I put the link on here because it's actually quicker for me to find a link that way...
ReplyDelete(I'm still exercising something of a voluntary purdah on agw comments myself, mainly because they tend to generate more heat than light - and I'm definitely seeking the light!)
Fair enough. Just saying that Watt's site is not necessarily a great source for light. Peace.
ReplyDeleteWhat no wattage? ;o)
ReplyDelete